| 翻訳と辞書 |
| imminent lawless action ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
imminent lawless action
"Imminent lawless action" is a standard currently used that was established by the United States Supreme Court in ''Brandenburg v. Ohio'' (1969), for defining the limits of freedom of speech. ''Brandenburg'' clarified what constituted a "clear and present danger", the standard established by ''Schenck v. United States'' (1919), and overruled ''Whitney v. California'' (1927), which had held that speech that merely advocated violence could be made illegal. Under the imminent lawless action test, speech is not protected by the First Amendment if the speaker intends to incite a violation of the law that is both imminent and likely. While the precise meaning of "imminent" may be ambiguous in some cases, the court provided later clarification in ''Hess v. Indiana'' (1973). In this case, the court found that Hess's words did not fall outside the limits of protected speech, in part, because his speech "amounted to nothing more than advocacy of illegal action at some indefinite future time,"〔 Hess v. Indiana, .〕 and therefore did not meet the imminence requirement.
==Quotation==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「imminent lawless action」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|